Influence of Different Factors on the Assessment of Strength of Masonry at Compression (to the question of improvement of norms on masonry constructions)

Number of journal: 7-2020
Autors:

Ishchuk M.K.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2020-782-7-67-75
УДК: 692.33

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The article shows the need to adjust the normative documents on masonry due to the inconsistency of a number of GOSTs for compression testing of bricks with each other, as well as with SP 15.1330.2012 “Masonry and reinforced masonry structures”. One of the problems arose in connection with a change in the method of preparing the surface of samples for testing ceramic bricks of plastic molding for compression in GOST 530-2012, where grinding became the main way to level the surface instead of the previously adopted solution leveling method. This led to an artificial overestimation of the brick compressive strength grade. To maintain the relationship between GOSTs and SP, it is optimal to introduce in GOST 530 transition factors from the strength of polished bricks to the strength of bricks with a solution leveling surface. There is an inconsistency in the methods of testing masonry with SP 15.1330.2012 and a number of other problems. Separate borrowings from European standards are inevitable due to the large number of modern materials and technologies that came from abroad. At the same time, the work shows that the mechanical introduction of individual fragments from other norms violates the integrity of the existing system of regulatory documents.
М.K. ISHCHUK, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Research Institute of Building Constructions named after V.A. Koucherenko (TSNIISK) JSC Research Center of Construction (6, 2-nd Institutskaya Street, Moscow, 109428, Russian Federation)

1. Onishchik L.I. Kamennye i armokamennye konstruktsii promyshlennykh i grazhdanskikh zdanii [Masonry and reinforced masonry structures of industrial and civil buildings]. Moscow–Ltningrad: Stroyizdat.1939. 208 p.
2. Polyakov S.V. Dlitel’noe szhatie kirpichnoi kladki [Prolonged compression of brickwork]. Moscow: Gosstroyizdat. 1959. 183 p.
3. Set of Rules 15.13330.2012. Kamennye i armokamennye konstruktsii [Masonry and reinforced masonry structures]. Moscow: Standartinform. 2019. 149 p. (In Russian).
4. Geniev G.A., Kurbatov A.S., Samedov F.A. Voprosy prochnosti i plastichnosti anizotropnykh materialov [Issues of strength and plasticity of anisotropic materials]. Moscow: INTERBUK. 1993. 187 p.
5. Samarasinghe W., Page A.W., Hendry A.W. A finite element model for the in-plane behaviour of brickwork. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 1982. Vol. 73, pp. 171–178.
6. Ishchuk M.K. The role of brick bending strength at compression of masonry. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction Materials]. 2018. No. 8, pp. 63–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2018-762-8-63-65 (In Russian).
7. Lent L.B., Pikkieva A. Kirpich i kirpichnaya kladka v SShA: (Issledovaniya i ispytaniya) [Brick and Brickwork in the USA: (Research and Testing)] Ed. by L. Onishchik. Moscow; Leningrad: ONTI. Chapters ed. builds. Literature.1937. 123 p.
8. Ishchuk M.K., Ishchuk E.M., Frolova I.G. The joint work of the “old” and “new” masonry in the walls under restoration. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2014. No. 1, pp. 28–30. (In Russian).
9. Onishchik L.I. Normy proektirovaniya kamennykh i armokamennykh konstruktsii. V kn. Normy proektirovaniya konstruktsii. Materialy urochnogo polozheniya. Chetvertaya redaktsiya [Standards for the design of masonry and reinforced-masonry structures. In a book: Standards for the design of structures. Materials of the curriculum. Fourth edition]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Ministry of Construction of Engineering Enterprises. 1949, pp. 37–65.
10. Molyavko-Vysotskii A.P. Rol’ rastvora i razlichnykh faktorov v prochnosti kladki [The role of mortar and various factors in the strength of the masonry]. Rostov-on-Don: Azov-Chernomorskoe regional book publishing. 1935. 69 p.
11. Kameiko V.A, Sementsov S.A. State and main directions of research of the strength of masonry structures. In the collection Theoretical and experimental studies of stone structures. Moscow. 1978, pp. 6–46. (In Russian).
12. Nekrasov V.P. Teoriya prochnosti kamennykh kladok [The theory of the strength of masonry]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 1947. 158 p.
13. GOST 32047–2012 Kladka kamennaya. Metod ispytaniya na szhatie [Masonry. Compression test method]. Moscow: Standartinform. 2014. 9 p. (In Russian).
14. DIN EN 1015-11–2020 Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar, 2020.
15. GOST 5802–86 Rastvory stroitel’nye. Metody ispytanii [Building solutions. Test methods]. Moscow: Standartinform. 2018. 17 p. (In Russian).
16. Poryadina N.A., Serebryanaya I.A. Statistical analysis of the applicability of an alternative method of testing strength under axial compression. In the collection proceedings of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference “Innovative technologies in science and education”. 2018, pp. 187–190. https://doi.org/10.23947/itno.2018.1.187–190
17. Derkach V.N., Galalyuk A.V. Influence of surface preparation of a masonry element on compressive strength determined according to EN 772-1. Stroitel’naya nauka i tekhnika. 2010. No. 5, pp. 47–50. (In Russian).
18. Fódi A. Effects influencing the compressive strength of a solid, fired clay brick. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. 2011. Vol. 55 (2), pp. 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.ci.2011-2.04
19. Sapelin N.A., Kim D.I. Methods for determining the strength of ceramic blocks. Tekhnologii betonov. 2010. No. 3–4, pp. 10–11. (In Russian).
20. Sapelin N.A., Kim D.I. Determination of compressive strength of large-format ceramic blocks: analysis of Russian and European test methods. Stroitel’nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii XXI veka. 2012. No. 12, pp. 46–48. (In Russian).
21. GOST 530–2007 Kirpich i kamen’ keramicheskie. Obshchie tekhnicheskie usloviya [Ceramic bricks and blocks. General technical conditions]. Moscow: Standartinform. 2007. 39 p. (In Russian).
22. GOST 530–2012 Kirpich i kamen’ keramicheskie. Obshchie tekhnicheskie usloviya [Ceramic bricks and blocks. General technical conditions]. Moscow: Standartinform. 2013. 27 p. (In Russian).
23. EN 772-1 Methods of test for masonry units. Part 1: Determination of compressive strength (British Standards Institute, 2011).
24. STB EN 772–1 Metody ispytanii stroitel’nykh blokov. Chast’ 1. Opredelenie prochnosti pri szhatii [Test methods for building blocks. Part 1. Determination of compressive strength]. Minsk: Gosstandart. 2008. 9 p. (In Russian).
25. GOST 8462–85 Wall materials. Methods for determining the ultimate strength in compression and bending. Moscow: Standartinform. 2011. 7 p. (In Russian).
26. GOST 7484–78 Kirpich i kamni keramicheskie litsevye. Tekhnicheskie usloviya [Face ceramic bricks and blocks. Technical conditions]. Moscow: Publishing house of standards. 2001. 6 p. (In Russian).
27. GOST 379–1995 Kirpich i kamni silikatnye. Tekhnicheskie usloviya [Silicate bricks and blocks. Technical conditions]. Moscow: Standartinform. 2015. 22 p. (In Russian).
28. Onishchik L.I. Features of the work of masonry structures under load in the stage of destruction. Digest of articles “Research on stone structures” Moscow-Leningrad: TsNIPS, Stroyizdat. 1949, pp. 5–44. (In Russian).
29. EN 1052–1–2009 Methods of test for masonry. Part 1. Determination of compressive strength.
30. SNiP II–22–81* Kamennye i armokamennye konstruktsii [Masonry and reinforced masonry structures]. Moscow: FGUP TsPP. 2004. 61 p. (In Russian).

For citation: Ishchuk M.K. Influence of different factors on the assessment of strength of masonry at compression (to the question of improvement of norms on masonry constructions). Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction Materials]. 2020. No. 7, pp. 67–75. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2020-782-7-67-75


Print   Email