About Problems of Representation of National Construction Science in International Data Bases

Number of journal: №7-2016
Autors:

T.A. ABAKUMOVA
E.I. YUMASHEVA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2016-739-7-4-8
УДК: 60:347.777

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
An attempt to analyze the publishing activity of scientists, working in the field of construction, in the international scientific space is presented. As one of the reasons for a small number of publications in highly-rated foreign editions, a local character of studies for solution of engineering problems not having the international value is specified. The describing analysis of Russian publications in highly-rated foreign editions for the period of 1996–2015 was made with the use of the Scopus data base. It is revealed that the presence of Russian authors in the top-journals approaches 1.5‰ (promille). Conclusions are made that the availability of international collaboration increases the average indexes of articles quoted. The question is also raised about the need to optimize requirements for publishing activity of scientists of applied scientific directions, to change the concept of scientific research in the field of architecture and construction.
T.A. ABAKUMOVA, Engineer-Technologist (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
E.I. YUMASHEVA, Engineer-Chemist-Technologist (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

OOO RIF «Stroymaterialy» (9, bld. 3, Off. 225, Dmitrovskoe shosse, 127434, Moscow, Russian Federation)

1. Pislyakov V.V. Methods for evaluation of scientific knowledge in terms of citation. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 2007. No. 1, pp. 128–140. (In Russian).
2. Tret’yakova O.V., Kabakova E.A. Opportunities and prospects of citation indexes in evaluating the results of a scientific institution. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2013. No. 6 (30), pp. 189– 200. (In Russian).
3. Aleskerov F.T., Kataeva E.S., Pislyakov V.V., Yakuba V.I. Evaluation researchers contribution threshold aggregation method. Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami. Spetsial’nyi vypusk 44: «Naukometriya i ekspertiza v upravlenii naukoi». 2013, pp. 172–189. (In Russian).
4. Chebotarev P.Yu. Scientometrics: how it can help to heal, not to maim? Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami. Spetsial’nyi vypusk 44: «Naukometriya i ekspertiza v upravlenii naukoi». 2013, pp. 14–31. (In Russian).
5. Aref’ev P.G. Publication activity, the possibility of a scientific product growth and the traditional Russian question “What to do?” Universitetskaya kniga. 2013. No. 8, pp. 49–55. (In Russian).
6. Aref’ev P.G. Publication activity: growth opportunities due to the activity of authors. Universitetskaya kniga. 2013. No. 9, pp. 80–86. (In Rassian).
7. Roberts G.G. SET for Success: the supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematic skills: The report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ Review / G.G. Roberts. London: HM Treasury, 2002. – URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/robertsreview_introch1.pdf. – Date of access: 01.06.2016.

For citation: 


Print   Email